In theory, ethical dilemmas are easy to solve: “Well, of course I’d say no to that” or “I would have done it this way—no question!” But when you’re faced with a real-life ethical issue … sometimes the choice isn’t very easy to make.
To help you practice solving these dilemmas, ASHA holds an annual Student Ethics Essay competition. The competition pushes you to think about a tough issue, study ASHA’s Code of Ethics, and articulate your thoughts about it.
Although we can’t help you solve a tough ethical dilemma, we can help you do your best on the essay. For expert advice, we reached out to Malayna Bailey from Marshall University and Ashley Peltier from Northeastern University to get some insights into how they approached their 2017 award-winning essays.
Why did you submit an essay?
MALAYNA: My professor gave it to us as an assignment and held a mini competition to select three for submission to ASHA.
ASHLEY: I’ve always loved writing! When the director of our in-house clinic spread the word about the competition, I was excited about the opportunity to learn more about the field and apply my new knowledge via one of my personal passions.
How did you approach the essay?
MALAYNA: First, I looked at ASHA’s Code of Ethics and found a principle that aligned with 2017’s topic, “Independent and Evidence-based Clinical Judgment.” After reading the code, I thought the best approach was to write about prognostic statements.
To familiarize myself with the typical format of the essays, I read past winning essays and learned that ones with examples and scenarios really stood out. They helped readers grasp the essence of the main ideas. After that, I just let myself get creative.
ASHLEY: I read through the Code of Ethics and selected principles that seemed especially relevant to the prompt. Then I drew on situations that had been discussed in my classes. We’d had many conversations about the ethics of assessing, diagnosing, and treating culturally and linguistically diverse individuals, which informed my scenario.
Why should students participate?
MALAYNA: Writing this essay made me read and apply the Code of Ethics in a meaningful way. It pushed me to think about an ethical issue and carefully articulate my thoughts on the matter. Of course, students should also participate because they might actually win $750!
ASHLEY: I found it greatly increased my familiarity with the ASHA Code of Ethics and I can now apply them automatically to every day clinical decisions.
What did you learn from the experience?
MALAYNA: The Code of Ethics is not at all a “law book” that’s only useful when you think someone has committed an ethics violation. It can be a tool that, when applied appropriately, can guide our practice to become better professionals.
ASHLEY: I gained confidence in my ability to recognize and handle potentially unethical scenarios in a clinical setting. Should I run into a questionable situation, I believe I’ll now know how to proceed with integrity.
Can you share any hints for success?
MALAYNA: Use the Code of Ethics as your guide, and use clear, concise examples or scenarios to relay your main ideas.
ASHLEY: Don’t shy away from writing about a situation because you’re unsure how to handle it. If you’re uncertain, it’s all the more reason to research it and equip yourself with an answer!
Now, Go Get Em!
So, there you have it—advice from someone who’s been there, done that—and even got a prize to show for it!
Good luck writing your essay—oh, and they’re due April 13!
Real ethical dilemmas rarely arrive with the clarity they have in classroom hypotheticals. Competing duties, incomplete information, and consequences for several people can make an apparently obvious answer much harder to defend. An essay competition is therefore useful as a structured workflow: students must identify the conflict, consult the Code of Ethics, compare possible actions, and explain why one response is more defensible than the alternatives. The strongest essays should go beyond declaring what is right and show how ethical principles guide a decision when reasonable considerations pull in different directions.
Workplace decisions become difficult when legal duties, company values, and practical constraints point in different directions. Clear HR compliance resources can help managers slow the process down: identify the applicable rule, document verified facts, separate allegations from conclusions, check whether similar cases were handled consistently, and define who has authority to decide. It is also useful to distinguish educational guidance from jurisdiction-specific legal advice. A short scenario section could show how the same framework applies to hiring, leave requests, disciplinary action, payroll records, and employee complaints without pretending that every case has one universal answer.
Essay submissions often include strict file-size limits, while embedded images, scanned references, and formatting can make a PDF unexpectedly large. A tool for reducir tamaño de PDF can make the final document easier to upload without requiring the writer to rebuild it from scratch. Processing the file locally in the browser is also valuable when an essay contains names, academic information, or other sensitive material. Free use without registration keeps the final submission workflow simple and avoids another account-creation step.
A strong revision process should check both length and readability. Contador de Palabras brings word and character counts together with sentence analysis, Spanish readability, keyword density, and writing rhythm. That combination can help a writer identify long sentences, repeated expressions, crowded paragraphs, or uneven pacing without switching between several separate tools. Character counts are useful for constrained titles and descriptions, while keyword frequency can reveal whether an important term is missing or being repeated too aggressively. These measurements should inform revision rather than dictate it: a lower score or longer sentence is not automatically a flaw when the meaning and audience justify the choice.